ANswer this pls,...How can you be true to others and true to yourself?!!?
You can be true to others only in the context of your concept of your own morality.How can you be true to others and true to yourself?!!?
Sometimes you can't,in those situations, you must decide who is more important ;yourself or others.
Friday, February 12, 2010
True or False: putting a tooth in milk after it falls out of your mouth preserves it?
I've heard this mentioned in a health class I took as factual, but then I watched a show called Mission Hill with the same situation, and it was expressed as an old Wives' tale. Is this factual or false?
Thanks.True or False: putting a tooth in milk after it falls out of your mouth preserves it?
Teeth are preserved whether you put them in something or not. Think of how archeologists find skeletons of ancient animals or even people and their teeth are still in tact.
I would say it's false because of lactose, which is sugar.. Sugar rots teeth. My brother actually got cavities because he drank milk all the time and never brushed his teeth.
Interesting question thoughTrue or False: putting a tooth in milk after it falls out of your mouth preserves it?
Okay let me explain this as I know it.
If you have an avulsed tooth, the VERY BEST thing you can do is to just make sure it doesn't have like big clumps of dirt on it, rinse it in isotonic saline if it has obvious debris (same concentration of salt as your tissues, like a teaspoon in a glass of warm not hot water) and place it back in the socket it came out of. Really.
Sometimes, like if you broke some bone near the socket and it's not accessible, you may not be able to put it right back in. In this case you should hold it in your mouth so that it is at least exposed to saliva which is good to keep it alive.
Basically if you loose a tooth like that, it's kinda like taking care of a transplant organ, like those coolers with ';body part'; written on them, you know? :) You want to keep it alive untill you can reestablish blood supply to it.
Milk would not be the best thing to do at all. If for some reason you can't keep the tooth in your own saliva, you should use isotonic saline solution, not milk. Milk would contain lactose that would not be good for the tooth, and the balance of ions would be all wrong for body tissues so you would be either drying the tooth out or waterlogging it, I'm not sure.
It probably comes from the fact that milk is good to drink for your teeth, since it has calcium and mineralizing elements in it, and so someone thought that it would be good to sit a tooth in it, which it is actually not.
Remember, shove the tooth back in your mouth! you have a waaay higher chance of saving it if you shove it back in and get to a dentist ASAP!
its true.. they say that in the dentist commercials with the dinosaurs lol
mine?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?鈥?/a>
it's true. But not for long if it's not refrigerated.
True. my friend lost her tooth and she put it in milk. it was just fine :]
Thanks.True or False: putting a tooth in milk after it falls out of your mouth preserves it?
Teeth are preserved whether you put them in something or not. Think of how archeologists find skeletons of ancient animals or even people and their teeth are still in tact.
I would say it's false because of lactose, which is sugar.. Sugar rots teeth. My brother actually got cavities because he drank milk all the time and never brushed his teeth.
Interesting question thoughTrue or False: putting a tooth in milk after it falls out of your mouth preserves it?
Okay let me explain this as I know it.
If you have an avulsed tooth, the VERY BEST thing you can do is to just make sure it doesn't have like big clumps of dirt on it, rinse it in isotonic saline if it has obvious debris (same concentration of salt as your tissues, like a teaspoon in a glass of warm not hot water) and place it back in the socket it came out of. Really.
Sometimes, like if you broke some bone near the socket and it's not accessible, you may not be able to put it right back in. In this case you should hold it in your mouth so that it is at least exposed to saliva which is good to keep it alive.
Basically if you loose a tooth like that, it's kinda like taking care of a transplant organ, like those coolers with ';body part'; written on them, you know? :) You want to keep it alive untill you can reestablish blood supply to it.
Milk would not be the best thing to do at all. If for some reason you can't keep the tooth in your own saliva, you should use isotonic saline solution, not milk. Milk would contain lactose that would not be good for the tooth, and the balance of ions would be all wrong for body tissues so you would be either drying the tooth out or waterlogging it, I'm not sure.
It probably comes from the fact that milk is good to drink for your teeth, since it has calcium and mineralizing elements in it, and so someone thought that it would be good to sit a tooth in it, which it is actually not.
Remember, shove the tooth back in your mouth! you have a waaay higher chance of saving it if you shove it back in and get to a dentist ASAP!
its true.. they say that in the dentist commercials with the dinosaurs lol
mine?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?鈥?/a>
it's true. But not for long if it's not refrigerated.
True. my friend lost her tooth and she put it in milk. it was just fine :]
The saying Why do good girls like bad boys is it true cause if that's true?
is this saying the same bad girls like good boys. can you explain that to me both saying. I dont know if a second one a saying but it must be true also.The saying Why do good girls like bad boys is it true cause if that's true?
Well it's true to a certain extent. Yes some ';good girls'; do like some ';bad boys';, but it doesn't mean all ';good girls'; like ';bad boys';. It's just another stereotype based on some truth.
871loan
Well it's true to a certain extent. Yes some ';good girls'; do like some ';bad boys';, but it doesn't mean all ';good girls'; like ';bad boys';. It's just another stereotype based on some truth.
871
Can we all agree the christians believe the bible is true because they want it to be true?
And not because there is any historical evidence to support it's validity?Can we all agree the christians believe the bible is true because they want it to be true?
That is an excellent summation in regard to the facts in evidence.Can we all agree the christians believe the bible is true because they want it to be true?
Yes, That is called Faith, which is what you have if you are Christian. Compare it to how you believe in scientific theory...much of which is unproven factually, but pieced together in a way science THEORIZES something happens. So you have faith in scientist that their theories are correct, Christians have faith that their bible is correct, and so on. There is actually historical evidence that supports biblical stories, and evidence that does not. Much like science, some theories prove to be true, some that were thought to be fact are proved to be false. You just have your faith in something entirely different than Christians.
Not even close.
There is a lot of historical evidence to support it's validity, through archaeology, and some non-biblical writings of the time.
Also, if you compare ancient sources, in terms of numbers of copies, and their ages, you will find that the Bible is, by a factor of about 1000, the best ancient source in existence.
You must also remember that the Bible is a compendium of books, not simply a book in itself. It contains all sorts of things, including songs, laws, histories, apocalypses, genealogies, wisdom sayings, parables, letters, love stories, myths, and, and .... The idea of ';truth'; depends a lot on what you mean by that. Did someone named Jesus exist about 2000 years ago? Yes - this is confirmed by these non-biblical sources I was talking about. Was there a real Good Samaritan? Likely not - this was a parable, a teaching story. The message is truth, but the details are not, and are not meant to be.
Jesus the human, and the Christ in the Bible are the same in many ways, yet very different. It's a paradox: Jesus the man was a Sage, a mystic, entrenched in the mysteries, the Nazarene, a philosopher king, Jesus or the Christ (personified divinity within all humanity) in the Bible is again attributed to the drama in the heavens, 12 apostles (Houses of the Zodiac) around the Son (Sun), Born on the 25th of December (winter Solstice) (Summer in reality of the Human Jesus), He was crucified (solar cross) and resurrected (in the spring), to bring redemption and new life. This is the same story repeated through out many of the worlds religions and not unique to the religion of Christianity alone. It is sun worship, and personification of creative spirit, i.e. God.
Christ is highly symbolic for Christianity, but most Christians are unaware of what and why the Church did certain things and why today things are the way they are. I highly doubt the Man, nay I know, the great teacher Jesus, one of the greatest teachers to ever live, would not approve of or wanted a religion modeled after him. He never claimed to be God, only a Son of God, through rebirth of philosophy, of consciousness, after all the religion known as Christianity had existed for many many years before the man known as Jesus appeared. Jesus spoke in parables and preached an exoteric message to the masses veiled in mystery and unfortunately taken literally, and another doctrine in private to those who could see and hear truth....
Look into the esoteric nature of things and not what is presented in mainstream in religion and philosophy alike and you will find many keys to the mysteries.
Many seem desperately want it be true, they have doubts, become very angry is anyone arouse their doubts, beliefs never affect reality however, regardless of how much they try ignore disproof, it not just disappear, is amazing how far apologists go, I see someone yesterday say skeptics can never find even one contradiction of Bible, more objective people list dozens of them, I cannot understand how anyone can blind himself at very obvious ignorance and contradictions of Bible.
Christians believe in the Bible because it is true and there is historical evidence to support its validity. Can we all agree that atheists believe that the Bible is not true because they don't want it to be true and not because there is any historical evidence to support their claims?
You will never understand a Christian belief unless you are a Christian. To a Christian the Bible is true. Every word of it. It is not a matter that a Christian wants it to be true. It is because the faith that we have that the Bible is true. And there is nothing anybody can say or do to alter that thought process.
I don't. The Bible and it's history is true whether I or any one else believe it or not.
For me as a believer I follow Jesus Christ's example of his reliance and belief in the God and the events written in the Old Testament. He believed in the historical truth and reality of those events written about them. In fact for him as with any one else. There were no other historical documents that summed up the best knowledge of time.
What I have never understood. Is why there is such a disparaging attitude amongst many today of people today. Who believe that ancient men were ignorant and stupid. That you cannot appreciate those who recorded knowledge and kept is safe and protected from harm and danger.
Sure much has been lost. If you really wanted to look at how men documented the historical events of their time and generation through time. This itself would be a fascinating study.
We have computers and online libraries today and can take or leave knowledge with the snap of our fingers. But in those ancient times. Think of the hours and sacrifice of the people who passed on knowledge from generation to generation. Even before the time of Jesus.
Even in historical times whether you choose to recognize it or not. People appreciated history and wrote it down. So that they do not forget.
But the cynicism and skepticism that is in man to hate the truth will seek to rewrite it so that the truth can never be found. Such are the people today that say the holocaust never happened. I am not of that group of people. The truth cuts both ways. But at least I know there is the truth.
I am sure and have complete confidence in the historical evidence and truth of the Bible. Just as Jesus did in his day about the Old Testament. Go to the Middle East and the cities and the peoples there. Go to their museums and their archaeological evidence in many museums all around the world with Biblical artifacts.
But I personally know the God of that Bible through Jesus Christ and His Spirit.
I hope this helps. If not. Oh well.
The book revealed on JESUS was GOSPEL but it is not available in its original form so you see many many socalled GOSPELS and 4 of them are included in bible which are not gospels but one can say the biography of JESUS narrated by his apostels, Gospel in its original form and language is not available so the authenticity of bible is a contoversial issue, for more info pls go to ENCYCLOPEDIA OF BRITANICA
No because they don't believe in all of it themselves. You will have a hard time finding any two Christians from the same faith agreeing on everything in the bible at the same time.
Be careful. (Jude 1:18)
The BIBLE it the very WORD OF GOD.
That's not man's opinion... it's God's. (Hebrews 4:12)
';LET GOD BE TRUE, but every man a liar';
-Romans 3:4
How is there not historcal evidence of its truth? It is being proven historically accurate constantly. As well as even being scientifically accurate
yes I agree. two thousand years of conditioning will do that. it still does not make it true and align with real history as the rest of us understand it.
You can say whatever you want, remember not to confuse discussion and agreement.
Oh and thanks for keeping this short, those wall of words are horrible.
We can. But they won't.
They will continue to believe those fairy tales even if it was proven right in their face it was false.
That's what brainwashing does to ya.
We can agree you believe that to be true because you want it to be true.
that sounds rather reasonable. I agree.
Can we all agree the atheists want the Bible to be false because they hate God and follow Satan instead?
Where does truth come for you? On what/whom do you base your truths on?
Yes.
Sure, why not?
truth doesn't change
that's part of it
The atheist says he needs proof, yet believes there is no God even though there is no proof that He does not or cannot exist. Go figure that one out.
Atheism is a convenient idea for those that want to believe it
That is an excellent summation in regard to the facts in evidence.Can we all agree the christians believe the bible is true because they want it to be true?
Yes, That is called Faith, which is what you have if you are Christian. Compare it to how you believe in scientific theory...much of which is unproven factually, but pieced together in a way science THEORIZES something happens. So you have faith in scientist that their theories are correct, Christians have faith that their bible is correct, and so on. There is actually historical evidence that supports biblical stories, and evidence that does not. Much like science, some theories prove to be true, some that were thought to be fact are proved to be false. You just have your faith in something entirely different than Christians.
Not even close.
There is a lot of historical evidence to support it's validity, through archaeology, and some non-biblical writings of the time.
Also, if you compare ancient sources, in terms of numbers of copies, and their ages, you will find that the Bible is, by a factor of about 1000, the best ancient source in existence.
You must also remember that the Bible is a compendium of books, not simply a book in itself. It contains all sorts of things, including songs, laws, histories, apocalypses, genealogies, wisdom sayings, parables, letters, love stories, myths, and, and .... The idea of ';truth'; depends a lot on what you mean by that. Did someone named Jesus exist about 2000 years ago? Yes - this is confirmed by these non-biblical sources I was talking about. Was there a real Good Samaritan? Likely not - this was a parable, a teaching story. The message is truth, but the details are not, and are not meant to be.
Jesus the human, and the Christ in the Bible are the same in many ways, yet very different. It's a paradox: Jesus the man was a Sage, a mystic, entrenched in the mysteries, the Nazarene, a philosopher king, Jesus or the Christ (personified divinity within all humanity) in the Bible is again attributed to the drama in the heavens, 12 apostles (Houses of the Zodiac) around the Son (Sun), Born on the 25th of December (winter Solstice) (Summer in reality of the Human Jesus), He was crucified (solar cross) and resurrected (in the spring), to bring redemption and new life. This is the same story repeated through out many of the worlds religions and not unique to the religion of Christianity alone. It is sun worship, and personification of creative spirit, i.e. God.
Christ is highly symbolic for Christianity, but most Christians are unaware of what and why the Church did certain things and why today things are the way they are. I highly doubt the Man, nay I know, the great teacher Jesus, one of the greatest teachers to ever live, would not approve of or wanted a religion modeled after him. He never claimed to be God, only a Son of God, through rebirth of philosophy, of consciousness, after all the religion known as Christianity had existed for many many years before the man known as Jesus appeared. Jesus spoke in parables and preached an exoteric message to the masses veiled in mystery and unfortunately taken literally, and another doctrine in private to those who could see and hear truth....
Look into the esoteric nature of things and not what is presented in mainstream in religion and philosophy alike and you will find many keys to the mysteries.
Many seem desperately want it be true, they have doubts, become very angry is anyone arouse their doubts, beliefs never affect reality however, regardless of how much they try ignore disproof, it not just disappear, is amazing how far apologists go, I see someone yesterday say skeptics can never find even one contradiction of Bible, more objective people list dozens of them, I cannot understand how anyone can blind himself at very obvious ignorance and contradictions of Bible.
Christians believe in the Bible because it is true and there is historical evidence to support its validity. Can we all agree that atheists believe that the Bible is not true because they don't want it to be true and not because there is any historical evidence to support their claims?
You will never understand a Christian belief unless you are a Christian. To a Christian the Bible is true. Every word of it. It is not a matter that a Christian wants it to be true. It is because the faith that we have that the Bible is true. And there is nothing anybody can say or do to alter that thought process.
I don't. The Bible and it's history is true whether I or any one else believe it or not.
For me as a believer I follow Jesus Christ's example of his reliance and belief in the God and the events written in the Old Testament. He believed in the historical truth and reality of those events written about them. In fact for him as with any one else. There were no other historical documents that summed up the best knowledge of time.
What I have never understood. Is why there is such a disparaging attitude amongst many today of people today. Who believe that ancient men were ignorant and stupid. That you cannot appreciate those who recorded knowledge and kept is safe and protected from harm and danger.
Sure much has been lost. If you really wanted to look at how men documented the historical events of their time and generation through time. This itself would be a fascinating study.
We have computers and online libraries today and can take or leave knowledge with the snap of our fingers. But in those ancient times. Think of the hours and sacrifice of the people who passed on knowledge from generation to generation. Even before the time of Jesus.
Even in historical times whether you choose to recognize it or not. People appreciated history and wrote it down. So that they do not forget.
But the cynicism and skepticism that is in man to hate the truth will seek to rewrite it so that the truth can never be found. Such are the people today that say the holocaust never happened. I am not of that group of people. The truth cuts both ways. But at least I know there is the truth.
I am sure and have complete confidence in the historical evidence and truth of the Bible. Just as Jesus did in his day about the Old Testament. Go to the Middle East and the cities and the peoples there. Go to their museums and their archaeological evidence in many museums all around the world with Biblical artifacts.
But I personally know the God of that Bible through Jesus Christ and His Spirit.
I hope this helps. If not. Oh well.
The book revealed on JESUS was GOSPEL but it is not available in its original form so you see many many socalled GOSPELS and 4 of them are included in bible which are not gospels but one can say the biography of JESUS narrated by his apostels, Gospel in its original form and language is not available so the authenticity of bible is a contoversial issue, for more info pls go to ENCYCLOPEDIA OF BRITANICA
No because they don't believe in all of it themselves. You will have a hard time finding any two Christians from the same faith agreeing on everything in the bible at the same time.
Be careful. (Jude 1:18)
The BIBLE it the very WORD OF GOD.
That's not man's opinion... it's God's. (Hebrews 4:12)
';LET GOD BE TRUE, but every man a liar';
-Romans 3:4
How is there not historcal evidence of its truth? It is being proven historically accurate constantly. As well as even being scientifically accurate
yes I agree. two thousand years of conditioning will do that. it still does not make it true and align with real history as the rest of us understand it.
You can say whatever you want, remember not to confuse discussion and agreement.
Oh and thanks for keeping this short, those wall of words are horrible.
We can. But they won't.
They will continue to believe those fairy tales even if it was proven right in their face it was false.
That's what brainwashing does to ya.
We can agree you believe that to be true because you want it to be true.
that sounds rather reasonable. I agree.
Can we all agree the atheists want the Bible to be false because they hate God and follow Satan instead?
Where does truth come for you? On what/whom do you base your truths on?
Yes.
Sure, why not?
truth doesn't change
that's part of it
The atheist says he needs proof, yet believes there is no God even though there is no proof that He does not or cannot exist. Go figure that one out.
Atheism is a convenient idea for those that want to believe it
What is the difference between believing something to be true in your heart and just wanting it to be true?
In response to one of my answers, the asker said that I didn't seem to understand the difference between the wisdom of the heart and emotional desire. Perhaps he was right. So could someone clue me in as to what the difference is? Is believing something in your heart the same as wanting it to be true? Seems so to me.What is the difference between believing something to be true in your heart and just wanting it to be true?
If you truly believe something to be true in your heart, you will feel calm and grounded about it. Conversely, if you are just wanting it to be true, you may feel unsure or anxious. This anxious feeling could be your natural instinct telling you that although you want it to be true, it really isn't. Listen to yourself, trust in those little 'butterflies' we get in our tummies. They will be your best guide.What is the difference between believing something to be true in your heart and just wanting it to be true?
Wanting, wishing and hoping are just that. These are inactive and uncreative states. Now, belief is usually based on knowledge.
You will have to examine each incidence in your experience.
I know, this is not a great answer, leaving you with your questioning. You would have to have a single example instead of this whole universe of possibilities. Example: Do you believe in God? The answer to that one is having faith, and that is sufficient.
i dont think there is any difference...things are true or not...
Well, I think the heart one is more like you accept it as fact. It would be irrefutable to you. However, wanting something to be true is only a desire where you know it's not true or could not be true.
There often isn't really much difference. Belief is often just wishful thinking.
There is a difference, but it is hard to express. I very much want there to be a slice of pie in my fridge, but I don't beleive there is becasue I know better. In the other direction, I beleive that I am broke, even though I really want to be wealthy.
From you Heart is to 'know'.
Wanting it to be true is from your 'ego'
If you truly believe something to be true in your heart, you will feel calm and grounded about it. Conversely, if you are just wanting it to be true, you may feel unsure or anxious. This anxious feeling could be your natural instinct telling you that although you want it to be true, it really isn't. Listen to yourself, trust in those little 'butterflies' we get in our tummies. They will be your best guide.What is the difference between believing something to be true in your heart and just wanting it to be true?
Wanting, wishing and hoping are just that. These are inactive and uncreative states. Now, belief is usually based on knowledge.
You will have to examine each incidence in your experience.
I know, this is not a great answer, leaving you with your questioning. You would have to have a single example instead of this whole universe of possibilities. Example: Do you believe in God? The answer to that one is having faith, and that is sufficient.
i dont think there is any difference...things are true or not...
Well, I think the heart one is more like you accept it as fact. It would be irrefutable to you. However, wanting something to be true is only a desire where you know it's not true or could not be true.
There often isn't really much difference. Belief is often just wishful thinking.
There is a difference, but it is hard to express. I very much want there to be a slice of pie in my fridge, but I don't beleive there is becasue I know better. In the other direction, I beleive that I am broke, even though I really want to be wealthy.
From you Heart is to 'know'.
Wanting it to be true is from your 'ego'
Is it true that there is no longer any true journalism and that all journalism is owned by a few people?
How so ?Is it true that there is no longer any true journalism and that all journalism is owned by a few people?
Yes.http://www.constitution.org/pub/swinton_鈥?/a> http://www.newswithviews.com/Hayes/giann鈥?/a> http://www.illuminati-news.com/Articles/鈥?/a> http://www.amerikanexpose.com/quotes1.ht鈥?/a>Is it true that there is no longer any true journalism and that all journalism is owned by a few people?
Most journalism is owned by a few big name companies, but I believe there are still some dedicated to the facts.
Yes.http://www.constitution.org/pub/swinton_鈥?/a> http://www.newswithviews.com/Hayes/giann鈥?/a> http://www.illuminati-news.com/Articles/鈥?/a> http://www.amerikanexpose.com/quotes1.ht鈥?/a>Is it true that there is no longer any true journalism and that all journalism is owned by a few people?
Most journalism is owned by a few big name companies, but I believe there are still some dedicated to the facts.
The saying Why do good girls like bad boys is it true cause if that's true?
is this saying the same bad girls like good boys. can you explain that to me both saying. I dont know if a second one a saying but it must be true also.The saying Why do good girls like bad boys is it true cause if that's true?
i dont think its trueThe saying Why do good girls like bad boys is it true cause if that's true?
I don't think it's true but I am a good girl and every guy I think is cute and start to like, happens to be bad. It bothers me sooo much!
The correct statement is that GIRLS IN GENERAL LIKE BAD BOYS
i dont think its trueThe saying Why do good girls like bad boys is it true cause if that's true?
I don't think it's true but I am a good girl and every guy I think is cute and start to like, happens to be bad. It bothers me sooo much!
The correct statement is that GIRLS IN GENERAL LIKE BAD BOYS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)