Saturday, February 6, 2010

What is the philosophy that a true statement is true without regard to reliability or sagacity of the speaker?

There is some kind of latin phrase or literature phrase to describe this, and it's NOT ';ad hominem'; I'm thinking about.What is the philosophy that a true statement is true without regard to reliability or sagacity of the speaker?
answering without universal philosophical recognition, i would have to say that truth is referenced to the actuality of the statement said or written .. does it exist? did the event actually occur? if a thing is naturally true .it could be said that the event occurred as described . and is an accurate description of the event,. it(at least to me)appears to reflect an ability to perceive and describe an event, and interpret it the desciprtion of a happening.,progressive observation tends to be larger than one individual's perception.. as newton discovered gravity, but he did not discover lifting and setting, or even falling of objects, these observations are lost in time.as are the integral values of rest and movement. but it is perceived true that he discovered the forcethat causes natural motion. truth tends to indicate the potential for a statement to be false and proves itself to be not false by regularity of occurence or the proof that an argument could not occur. and if an event is proven to be not false it is true, the yes no formation appears as an I did I did not or that someone/something did or did not do a thing . or as a group interpretation, of individual observations. basically truth means something that has happened or is happening and not something that has not happened or is not happeningWhat is the philosophy that a true statement is true without regard to reliability or sagacity of the speaker?
Okay ... the statement one says may be true, even though the person who says it may be a liar. Therefore 'A true statement is true without regard to reliability or sagacity of the speaker' is just a 'fancy way' of saying what I said in my statement. Neither is really 'clear' though ... I could have used 'person' in the first half of the sentence, but that would be too many 'persons' in the sentence. Basically Truth is always Truth, whether the person saying it is a truth-teller or a liar.

No comments:

Post a Comment